Banking Apps - Are They Easy to Use?

How Accessible Are Online Banking Apps for Blind Users?

Online banking has transformed the way we manage money. Checking an account balance, paying a bill, transferring money, or freezing a card can often be done in seconds on a smartphone.

For blind and low-vision users, convenience depends on how well an app works with assistive technology. A good-looking interface is not always easy to use without sight. (Wentz et al., 2017) Buttons might have unclear labels, important details might appear only in color, or security steps might stop someone from finishing a transaction on their own. (Top Mobile Banking Accessibility Mistakes, n.d.)

The good news is that many banks have improved their apps in recent years. Modern smartphones come with helpful tools like VoiceOver on Apple devices and TalkBack on Android. (Admin, 2026) (Get started on Android with TalkBack, 2023) When apps are designed well, these features can help users manage their money independently.

However, not all providers offer the same level of accessibility.

Some apps let customers check balances, transfer money, and manage cards on their own, while others make even simple tasks difficult.

This guide looks at what users should expect from a modern banking app, common problems that make apps hard to use, and the features that help people manage money on their own.

Why Independent Money Management Matters

Managing your finances is about more than just convenience. It also means having privacy, security, and independence.

No one should have to ask someone else to read their balance, check a transaction, or enter payment details just because an app was not designed for assistive technology.

For someone with sight loss, an effective app can provide:

• Greater financial independence
• Improved privacy
• Faster access to account information
• More control over payments
• Easier card management
• Greater confidence when handling money
• Less dependence on telephone or branch support

If an app does not work well, it can have the opposite effect. Customers might need to call support, go to a branch, or ask someone else to help with tasks that should be private. (Barriers to Digital Inclusion 2, n.d.) (Top Mobile Banking Accessibility Mistakes, n.d.)

This is especially worrying when sensitive information is at stake.

Your account balance, recent purchases, payment recipients, and security settings are personal. You should be able to access this information privately, using the technology that suits you best.

Accessing your accounts independently is more than convenience. It is a key part of having equal access to modern financial services. (Wentz et al., 2017)

What Should a Good App Provide?

A good mobile banking app should work well with the accessibility features already built into today's smartphones. (Team, 2026) (Mobile Application Accessibility Handbook, 2024)

For people using screen readers, this means buttons and controls need clear names, information should be in a logical order, and important changes should be announced right away. (When a screen reader needs to announce content, 2025)

Useful features include:

• Reliable VoiceOver or TalkBack support
• Clearly labeled buttons and controls
• Logical navigation
• Properly identified form fields
• Accessible error messages
• Usable authentication
• Clear transaction confirmations
• Readable notifications
• Sufficient time for important tasks
• Compatibility with text enlargement and display settings

These are not just nice-to-have features. They are essential for customers to manage their own finances. (Wentz et al., 2017)

A good app should also be consistent. If you learn how to find transactions, manage a card, or make a payment, those steps should stay familiar even after an update. (Wentz et al., 2017) (Designing Trust: UX Design Principles for Modern Fintech Apps, 2026)

If you are new to screen readers, our guide Choosing the Right Screen Reader explains the main options and what to think about when choosing one.

Screen Reader Support Is Essential

Screen readers are among the most important tools for people who cannot see a smartphone display clearly. (Silva et al., 2022, pp. 848-852)

On an iPhone or iPad, VoiceOver reads information aloud and lets users navigate with gestures. Android devices offer TalkBack, which provides similar functionality. (Use Select to Speak - Android Accessibility Help, 2023)

For a banking app, simply working with a screen reader is just the beginning.

Every interactive element should have a useful name. Instead of announcing an unlabeled icon as simply "button", the software should tell the user whether it opens transactions, transfers money, manages cards, or performs another action. (Ensure ARIA buttons, links, and menu items have accessible names, n.d.)

Information should also be presented in an understandable order. (Rivenburgh, 2026)

For example, imagine a payment screen containing:

• Recipient
• Amount
• Payment date
• Reference (Elefant, 2024)ence
• Confirm button

A screen reader user should encounter these items in a sensible sequence. If the confirmation control is announced before the amount or recipient, the user is more likely to confirm the wrong transaction. (Accessibility Features and Facilitators in Digital Financial Services for Blind Users, 2024)

Important status changes should also be communicated. If a payment is processing, rejected, or completed, the user should not have to guess what happened. (Mobile accessibility checklist, 2022)

Good screen reader support changes an app from (Reuschel et al., 2023, pp. 479-490) something you can just use to something you can use independently.

Navigation Should Be Predictable

Navigation can become surprisingly difficult when an application has a complicated interface.

A sighted customer can often scan a screen and identify where different controls are located. A screen reader user generally explores the interface sequentially. (Huq & He, 2026) (Accessibility | HarvardSites Design System, n.d.)

That is why a logical structure matters.

Menus should have descriptive names. Headings can help users understand different sections, while related controls should be grouped. (WCAG 2.1 guidelines, 2018)

For example, card-management options might include:

• View card details
• Freeze card
• Replace card
• Change card settings
• Report a lost card

These options should be easy to find and tell apart.

Unexpected jumps between screens can also cause problems. If an app moves you somewhere else after an action, it should clearly explain what happened. (Top Mobile Banking Accessibility Mistakes, 2023)

Consistency is important. A button should do the same thing wherever it appears in the app. (Designing Trust: UX Design Principles for Modern Fintech Apps, 2026)

Labels and Controls Matter

Icons can make an app look clean and modern, but they are not always clear when a screen reader reads them aloud. (Puli et al., 2026, pp. 234-245)

A visual symbol might show a transfer, card, or settings to someone who can see the screen. But a blind user might only hear "button" unless the developer adds a clear label. (Digital Accessibility Fundamentals: Links & Buttons, 2026)

This issue is especially serious in banking apps.

Users should never have to guess if a button will transfer money, delete a recipient, freeze a card, or change a security setting. (Rivenburgh, 2026)

Labels should be:

• Descriptive
• Concise
• Consistent
• Relevant to the action
• Announced correctly by assistive technology

Decorative graphics should also be identified properly so they do not add extra noise for scr (Decorative images must not be exposed to assistive technology | WCAG 1.1.1 Fix Guide, 2026)een reader users. element. The goal is to make sure users receive the information they need to understand and operate the interface.

Important Information Should Not Rely on Color

Color often communicates financial information. (Accessible Color Systems for Financial Products and Banking Apps, n.d.)

A spending chart might use different colors for groceries, transport, entertainment, and household expenses. A payment might appear green when successful or red when rejected.

Color can help, but it should not be the only way to share information. (Use of color - Accessibility, 2025) (Use of color - Accessibility | MDN, 2025)

Important information should also be available through text, labels, symbols, or other ways that do not rely on vision. (Accessibility principles - CFPB Design System, 2026)

For example, instead of relying solely on a red warning indicator, an application could announce:

Payment failed — insufficient funds.

This way, every customer can get the same important information.

The same idea applies to graphs, charts, and account summaries. Screen reader users should be able to get the key facts without seeing the visuals. (Charts, graphs, and infographics, n.d.)

Security Must Work for Everyone

Security presents one of the biggest challenges for financial applications. (Baybarin, 2026) (Baybarin, 2026)

Banks and other financial providers understandably need strong measures to protect customers from fraud. However, security systems should not create unnecessary barriers for people using assistive technology.

A secure process can still be simple if it is designed well.

When possible, authentication should offer different options, and users should get clear feedback when something works or fails. (Understanding Success Criterion 3.3.8: Accessible Authentication (Minimum), 2023)

Security matters because customers may not want to ask others for help with passwords, codes, or personal details.

Biometric Login

Fingerprint and facial recognition (Wentz et al., 2017)n can make signing in much easier.

When set up well, biometric authentication can reduce the need to type in passwords. This is especially helpful for people who have trouble finding or using small touch targets. (Brink & Scollan, 2019)

However, biometric login should not be the only option.

If recognition fails, users need another way to log in on their own. The app should clearly say if authentication worked, failed, or needs to be tried again.

One-Time Passcodes

Many financial services use one-time passcodes delivered by text message or generated through an authentication application. (Aparicio et al., 2023)

These systems can work well with assistive technology, but their setup matters.

Problems can arise when:

• The code is not announced automatically.
• The user is moved between screens unexpectedly.
• The code expires too quickly.
• The input field has no useful label.
• There is no clear confirmation after submission.

Security should never rely on how fast someone can see and enter information. (Wentz et al., 2017) (Rivenburgh, 2026)

CAPTCHAs and Verification

CAPTCHAs can create significant barriers. (CAPTCHA Accessibility: WCAG 2.2 Compliance for PHP Developers, 2025) (CAPTCHA Accessibility: WCAG 2.2 Compliance for PHP Developers, 2025)

A visual challenge requiring someone to identify objects in photographs may be impossible for a blind customer to complete.

When additional verification is needed, providers should offer an alternative that doesn't depend on vision. (Accessible Banking for People with Visual Impairments, 2026)

The best solution is not just to offer a separate process that works in theory. The alternative should be practical, secure, and easy to use. (Accessible ATMs and Online Banking: A Compliance Guide, 2026)

Making Payments Independently

Making a payment is one of the most important tests of an application's usability.

Customers should be able to complete the whole process without needing help from someone who can see.

That includes:

1. Selecting the correct account.
2. Choosing or entering the recipient.
3. Entering the amount.
4. Adding a reference when required.
5. Selecting the payment date.
6. Reviewing the details.
7. Confirming the transaction.
8. Receiving confirmation of the result.

Every stage needs to work with the user's preferred assistive technology. (Puli et al., 2026) (Kerdar et al., 2024)

The review screen is especially important. (Wentz et al., 2017)

Before money leaves your account, you should be able to check the recipient, amount, and date yourself. This information should be easy to find, not hidden in graphics or hard-to-use parts of the app. (Rivenburgh, 2026)

Confirmation is just as important. After you make a payment, the app should clearly confirm it is complete. (Rivenburgh, 2026)

Error Messages Need Clear Information

Mistakes can happen in any app. What matters is whether users can understand and fix them.

A useful error message should explain:

• What went wrong
• Where the problem occurred
• What needs to be changed
• What the user should do next

For example, showing a red warning that says "Invalid information" does not give enough detail.

A screen reader should identify the problem and, where possible, direct the user to the relevant field. (Understanding Success Criterion 3.3.1: Error Identification, 2024)

The same principle applies to successful actions.

If a transfer fails, the user should know that it failed and why. If it succeeds, the application should say so clearly. (Elefant, 2026)

Silence is a big problem when money is involved because customers may not know if the transaction went through. (Wentz et al., 2017) (Wentz et al., 2017)

Notifications and Security Alerts

Notifications can provide an important layer of financial protection. (Wentz et al., 2017)

An application might notify a customer when:

• A payment has been made.
• Money has been received.
• A card has been used.
• A suspicious transaction has been detected.
• A card is about to expire.
• An important account setting has changed.

These alerts need meaningful text.

A notification that just says "Important message" is not very helpful. Customers should know what the alert is about without opening a complicated screen.

Users should be able to control their notification settings. Important security alerts should be easy to tell apart from less important promotional messages. (Wentz et al., 2017)

For people with sight loss, being able to get and understand these alerts on their own is especially valuable. (Accessible Banking for People with Visual Impairments, n.d.)

Websites Still Have an Important Role

Although mobile applications are now central to personal finance, websites remain important.

Some customers may find that a provider's website works better with their particular screen reader than its mobile application. Others may experience the reverse. (Access Barriers in Websites and Mobile Apps, 2023) (Access Barriers in Websites and Mobile Apps, 2023)

So, it is a good idea to try both options.

If an app gives you trouble, try signing in on the provider's website. You might find some tasks easier there.

However, using the website shouldn't be a long-term fix for an inaccessible app.

If a service is difficult to use, report the problem. Specific feedback can help developers identify issues they may not have found during testing. (Wentz et al., 2017)

Different Providers Offer Different Experiences

No universal answer exists for which financial provider has the best app.

Experiences can vary according to:

• Operating system
• Screen reader
• Device model
• App version
• User experience level
• Type of financial task

An application that works particularly well with VoiceOver on an iPhone might behave differently with TalkBack on Android. (Admin, 2026)

Updates can also introduce changes. A feature that previously worked perfectly may become difficult to operate after a redesign. (IndusInd Indie App Update Locks Out Blind Users - A Serious Accessibility Crisis, 2025) (Top Mobile Banking Accessibility Mistakes, n.d.)

That is why testing the app yourself is often more helpful than just trusting an accessibility statement or marketing claim. (Wester, 2022)

An accessibility statement might say a provider cares about inclusion, but what really matters is whether you can do the tasks you need.

A Practical Testing Checklist

If you are evaluating your current financial application, try completing the following tasks without sighted assistance.

Can you sign in independently?

Can your screen reader identify the main controls?

Can you find your account balance?

Can you read recent transactions?

Can you open transaction details?

Can you make a payment?

Can you select the correct recipient?

Can you enter and verify an amount?

Can you review a transaction before confirming it?

Does the app clearly announce the outcome?

Can you understand error messages?

Can you manage your cards?

Can you change relevant security settings?

Can you use biometric authentication?

Is there an alternative if biometric login fails?

Can you receive and understand security alerts?

Can you complete important tasks without unnecessary time pressure?

Can you contact customer support independently?

You do not need every feature to be perfect.

What matters most is whether you can do the most important financial tasks safely, privately, and on your own.

What To Do When You Find Problems

If an app does not work well, it is worth reporting the problem.

When contacting the provider, try to describe the problem as specifically as possible.

Instead of saying:

"The app isn't accessible."

You could explain:

"Using VoiceOver, the confirmation button on the payment screen is announced without a label, so I cannot determine what action it will perform."

Specific details help developers investigate the issue.

It can also be useful to mention:

• Your device
• Operating system
• Screen reader
• Application version
• The task you were attempting
• What you expected to happen
• What actually happened

If the issue involves a financial transaction, avoid sending passwords, account numbers, or other confidential information when reporting it.

Escalating a Complaint

If reporting a problem does not produce a satisfactory response, consider using the provider's formal complaints process.

Keep copies of your messages and note when the problem happened. If you cannot complete an important financial task because of the issue, make that clear.

Depending on where you live, additional consumer, financial, or disability-access protections may be available.

Our guide Accessibility Laws: What Users Should Know provides a broader introduction to accessibility rights and service providers' responsibilities.

What Good Design Looks Like

The best banking apps do not make you think about accessibility every time you use them.

A well-designed app should feel natural to use.

You should be able to open the app, go to the section you need, understand the information, and finish your task using the tools you usually rely on.

This means accessibility should be built into the product from the start, not added later.

It includes navigation, forms, authentication, transaction reviews, notifications, error handling, and confirmation messages.

It also means testing with people who actually use assistive technology.

Automated testing can find some technical issues, but it cannot fully show what it is like for someone managing their money on their own. (Limitations of automated testing, 2024) (Limitations of automated testing, 2024)

That is why real-world testing matters. (Wentz et al., 2017)

Choosing a Better Financial App

If you are considering changing providers, accessibility should be one factor in your decision.

Do not pick an app just because it looks good or has many features.

Instead, focus on what you need to do every day.

Ask yourself:

• Can I check my balance independently?
• Can I read transactions?
• Can I make payments?
• Can I manage my card?
• Can I receive security alerts?
• Can I contact support?
• Can I complete these tasks using my normal assistive technology?

It can also help to ask other blind or low-vision users about their experiences, but keep in mind that accessibility can change depending on the device or app version. (Doe & Smith, 2018, pp. 45-67)

An app that works well for one person may not work as well for someone else. (Accessible Personal Finance: Dollars and 'Sense' for Blind and Low-Vision Seniors, 2016)

The Future of Financial Apps

Financial services are becoming increasingly digital, and that trend is unlikely to reverse. (Financial Services Digital Transformation Trends & Industry Analysis 2026, 2026) (Digital Transformation in Financial Services, 2016)

As more people use smartphones to manage their money, inclusive design becomes even more important.

Artificial intelligence, voice controls, better biometrics, and smarter mobile apps could make banking easier. But new technology will only help if it is designed for all users from the start. (Rivenburgh, 2026)

Future apps should make everyday banking tasks simpler, not more complicated. (Wentz et al., 2017)

The goal is simple: everyone should be able to manage their money securely, privately, and confidently, whether they use a screen reader, magnification, large text, voice control, or another assistive tool. The development of assistive technology. You can read more about where these developments may lead in The Future of Accessibility Technology.

Final Thoughts

Online banking can give blind and low-vision users a lot of independence.

Instead of relying on branches or other people, you can check balances, review transactions, make payments, manage cards, and keep an eye on security right from your phone.

But this independence depends on good design: clear labels, easy navigation, screen reader support, simple authentication, clear error messages, and helpful notifications are all essential.

No app has to be perfect, and everyone has different needs. But everyone should be able to do basic banking tasks without needing someone else's help.

If your current app works well, appreciate it. If it does not, report the problems and ask for improvements.

The more people give specific feedback, the harder it is for banks to ignore the needs of customers who use assistive technology.

In the end, good banking technology should not make you wonder if you can use it.

It should simply let you manage your money.

More About Digital Accessibility

If you are exploring accessibility and assistive technology, these related guides may also be useful:

• Choosing the Right Screen Reader
• Common Accessibility Mistakes Websites Still Make
• Accessibility Laws: What Users Should Know
• The Future of Accessibility Technology
• Accessible Smart Home Devices That Actually Help
• Voice Assistants for Visually Impaired Users

Building a more accessible digital world is not just about better technology. It is about giving people the freedom to use it on their own, privately, and with confidence.

References

Admin. (2026). Mobile Screen Reader Testing — TalkBack vs VoiceOver Complete Guide 2026. AccessiTool Blog. https://www.accessitool.com/blog/mobile-screen-reader-testing-talkback-vs-voiceover-guide-2026

(n.d.). Barriers to Digital Inclusion 2. https://afb.org/research-and-initiatives/bdis-series/barriers-digital-inclusion-2

Wentz, B., Pham, D. (. & Tressler, K. (2017). Exploring the accessibility of banking and finance systems for blind users. First Monday 22(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i3.7036

Wentz, B., Pham, D. (. & Tressler, K. (2017). Exploring the accessibility of banking and finance systems for blind users. First Monday 22(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i3.7036

Wentz, B., Pham, D. (. & Tressler, K. (2017). Exploring the accessibility of banking and finance systems for blind users. First Monday 22(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i3.7036

Huq, S. F. & He, Z. (2026). Bridging the Gap between Automated Intervention and Actual User Experience: A Mixed-Methods Study on Mobile Accessibility Issues for Screen Reader Users. Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791293

(2026). Designing Trust: UX Design Principles for Modern Fintech Apps. UXmatters. https://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2026/08/designing-trust-ux-design-principles-for-modern-fintech-apps.php

Brink, R. t. & Scollan, R. (2019). Usability of Biometric Authentication Methods for Citizens with Disabilities. MITRE. https://www.mitre.org/news-insights/publication/usability-biometric-authentication-methods-citizens-disabilities

Wentz, B., Pham, D. (. & Tressler, K. (2017). Exploring the accessibility of banking and finance systems for blind users. First Monday 22(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i3.7036

Puli, L., Kooijman, L., Kanij, T., Hartel, C., Shahriar, A. Z. & Rotaru, K. (2026). Accessibility of Digital Financial Applications for People With Visual Impairment: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 28. https://doi.org/10.2196/82315

Wentz, B., Pham, D. (. & Tressler, K. (2017). Exploring the accessibility of banking and finance systems for blind users. First Monday 22. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i3.7036

(2023). Access Barriers in Websites and Mobile Apps. American Foundation for the Blind. https://www.afb.org/research-and-initiatives/bdis-series/barriers-digital-inclusion-survey/access-barriers-web-mobile

(May 16, 2025). IndusInd Indie App Update Locks Out Blind Users - A Serious Accessibility Crisis. TechnoFino. https://technofino.in/community/threads/indusind-indie-app-update-locks-out-blind-users-a-serious-accessibility-crisis.40899/

(2024). Limitations of automated testing. Intelligence Community Design System. https://design.sis.gov.uk/accessibility/testing/automated-testing-limitation/

Baybarin, M. (2026). Spotting cyberthreats: a guide for blind and low-vision users. Kaspersky official blog. https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/be-my-eyes-ai-safety-for-visually-impaired/55611/

(2025). Use of color - Accessibility. MDN Web Docs. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/Guides/Understanding_WCAG/Perceivable/Use_of_color